The System 9 power tool withÌýreal-time depth measurement
CD NXT provides real-time depth measurement as you drill. Designed to provide you with fast, accurate and consistent digital depth measurement across a variety of procedures.
Suitable for both bicortical and unicortical screws.
Simple &ÌýconsistentÌý
power tool
power tool
Ìý
CD NXT features a head attachment with digitalÌýreadout screen, allowing for one-step drillingÌýand cortex to cortex measurement.
Ìý
With a live depth up to 99 mm.
See CD NXT
in action
Ìý
Ìý
Ìý
Ìý
Discover the research
The use of traditional depth gauges poses significant challenges in orthopedic trauma surgeries.
This includes increased risk of contamination and potential threats to patient safety2, difficulties in achieving accurate measurements1 and implant wastage3.
Patient safety
The design of manual depth gauges do not allow for thorough sterilization.2
Accuracy
55%
(or more) of manual depth gauge measurements are inaccurate.1
Sustainability
Implant waste occurs in
25%
trauma procedures, with 91% being screws.3
Ìý
Ìý
A system that’s compatible
CD NXT is compatible with all cordless driver attachments and various plating systems.
CD NXT is compatible with all Cordless Driver attachments, designed for various implant systems and fit for both locking and non-locking screws.
Plating that fits for you. ¾ÅÉ«ÊÓƵ plating portfolio is designed with you in mind. CD NXT may be used with Stryker and various other manufacturer’s.
Connect with your local power tool rep.
Contact us for more information.
Thank you!
Meet Stryker’s complete power tool family System 9
The power you need to perform.
Quality you can rely on.
References:
- Liu P, Xiao JX, Zhao C, Li X, Sun G, Yang F, Wang X. Factors Associated With the Accuracy of Depth Gauge Measurements. Front Surg. 2022 Jan 13;8:774682. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.774682. PMID: 35096957; PMCID: PMC8793061. (Involving 585 measurements and 13 surgeons. Surgeon expertise significantly influenced accuracy, with senior, intermediate, andÌýjunior surgeons achieving 57.0%, 42.2%, and 31.5% accuracy, respectively.)
- Lopes LKO, Costa DM, Tipple AFV, Watanabe E, Castillo RB, Hu H, Deva AK, Vickery K. Complex design of surgical instruments as barrier for cleaning effectiveness, favouring biofilm formation. J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e53-e60. (After 20 cycles of contamination, cleaning, and steam sterilization, evenÌýwith manual and manual plus automated cleaning methods, complex-design reusable surgical instruments, including depth gauges, used in orthopaedic surgery retained biological residues andÌýbiofilms.)
- Jayakumar N, Munuswamy S, Kulshreshtha R, Deshmukh S. Implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma: a UK experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Mar;102(3):225-228. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0151. Epub 2019 Oct 29. PMID: 31660763; PMCID: PMC7027411. (Within a one-year period, 25.1% of orthopaedic trauma procedures experienced implant wastage, primarily consisting of screws (91%). The total cost of wastage was £8,377.25, representing 2% of the implant budget, with wasted intramedullary nails accounting for nearly half of the expenses.
SMACC 2024-34776
D0000219585